|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
   |
Posted - 2007.10.06 07:17:00 -
[1]
press 1 if you want the 5th turret |
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.10.13 05:49:00 -
[2]
seems like CCP will continue to ignore the problem. big suprise there 
and from what I see in the forums, there is 1 goon saying "no" to all the people saying yes. But then again, it is a goonie, cant really take their opinion seriously seeing as they are just out to troll every thread they can. 
|
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.10.14 10:07:00 -
[3]
Edited by: FamersUsedTo BeatUs on 14/10/2007 10:09:17
Edited by: FamersUsedTo BeatUs on 14/10/2007 10:07:47
I keep hearing this word floating around, HAC.
Heavy assault cruiser. All cruisers under this name do great damage to targets, both big and small. All expect for the eagle. 5th turret does not make the eagle uber like the one guy defending 4 turrets thinks. All it does it create a HEAVY ASSUALT CRUISER that can deal out equal damage to targets larger then a interceptor and it also keeps its ability to destory interceptors better then the other hacs. Filling its role as a HAC and as a specialized long range inty killer.  shocking, I know..... to think that the eagle will actually be able to hold its own like every other hac in the game.
|
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.10.15 04:23:00 -
[4]
It seems as if Goumindong is trolling, with the logic behind the last couple of his comments.... his arguments are making less sense and is as if he is just trying to get the last word in every time.
Nearly 60 page Thread means something should be done about the Eagle..... CCP wake up!
Eagle is the only hac that gets two range bonuses, that does not mean it should be punished to terrible dps compared to other hacs, it just means it is filling its intended role. Zealot and Munnin both still out dps the 5t eagle at optimal range against cruiser and larger targets so stfu and present new arguments instead of the same shiet over and over again from 20 pages ago.
|
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.10.16 03:00:00 -
[5]
Don't get too worked up Elenath, Goumindong is clearly trolling at this point.
Eagle is in need of fixing, give it a additional turret or try out agility/drone bay fixes... but lets get it up somewhere where players can actually test it and give actual feedback to the Developers, not this "we cant do it because I need to feed more bullshiet about it not being worth putting up" crap that a certain individual I named earlier is trying to say. Also, wait for him to try and get the last word in on the situation, I love this part!  |
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.10.18 02:16:00 -
[6]
So its settled then, the eagle should have a 5th turret fit and be placed on the test server for players to test and give feedback to the developers. I just want to thank everyone involved in this thread, whether you where trying to confuse people by presenting bogus opinions that reflect anything but the truth or if you actually presented suggestions, ideas and actual facts including quotes from developers. I am sure CCP will take a good long look at this thread and do the right thing.   |
FamersUsedTo BeatUs
|
Posted - 2007.12.17 00:38:00 -
[7]
After the trinity update, I think the eagle needs a 5th turret even more. Scripts directly affected the eagle because the eagle is specialized in long range combat, and it takes more mid slots to properly fit a sniper eagle now. Players who gave up some range in the eagle to fit somewhat of a tank are in a sticky situation. They must give up the last few mid slots to fit for the same range as before patch, severely reducing their tanking ability at all. Eagle needs the 5th turret more then ever to still be a viable ship in the new face of fleet warfare.
|
|
|
| |
|